Teachers and school leaders sacrificed so much during a global pandemic. A tsunami of issues came hurtling their way, but they stood on the shore, dug in their heels, and would not be moved.
They embraced the Zoom age, hybrid teaching, and remote learning, while constantly dodging complaints from parents, students, and politicians. Some didn't make it, but most persevered.
A global pandemic, as I see it, could not defeat educators.
The battle with the education system, though, continues, and the pandemic has landed many devastating punches, exposing education's worst flaws.
Education may be down, but it's not out yet. While exposing the flaws, the pandemic has also cleared the path to change. Let's look at the flaws and the paths to improving the system.
Flaw: testing and grades
The idea of sorting and labeling students has been around since the days of the one-room schoolhouse. These outdated methods have never done anything but misrepresent learners and discourage independent learning.
While the pandemic ended some standardized testing (one positive result), most schools forged ahead with unit tests and semester exams, even as students battled their own pandemic-related demons.
School leaders demanded grades, and teachers, many acting on the premise that they needed to maintain the status quo, delivered one assignment after another, handing out late penalties and zeros, as if life were no different from 2019 and before.
Students failed and talk of lost learning, summer school, retention, and other outdated interventions ensued.
Sure, people have discussed this flaw before the pandemic; many teachers have penned books on the subject. Now, though, when stress, anxiety, and depression are at all-time highs, more people are lamenting the deleterious effects of testing and grades on students.
Path to change: abolish tests and grades
While many schools stood by their traditional systems, some saw the pandemic as an opportunity to change their practice. They chose projects and other unique assignments over exams, and they created progressive alternatives to grades. (Granted, some of those were workarounds, but they are a step in the right direction, nonetheless.) With this door cracked, there's never been a better time to kick it wide open.
For years, powerful companies--Google is one--have underscored their preference for employees who exhibit creativity, innovation, and cooperation, rather than high GPAs and SAT scores. Some private and public schools have elected to assess learning with portfolios, badges, and mastery transcripts.
Numerous colleges and universities have eliminated the GPA as part of their application process, electing to use portfolios and other assets that better represent a student's achievement. "Digital portfolios create a virtual time capsule for high school students, illustrating growth over many school years," writes Starr Sackstein in Hacking Assessment. "When entering college, students can show admissions officers real work—examples of performance and progress that say much more about learning than a GPA ever could."
Modern technologies are also making feedback for learning easy and impactful. Some companies are teaching feedback literacy to students and parents, helping them learn to assess themselves and their peers--a quality that business owners are requesting more often.
Throwing out tests and grades is, of course, a systemic change that requires more than simply tossing out points, letters, and report cards. If anything, the pandemic taught us that we are resourceful people, who will do whatever it takes to improve. The path to reimagining how learning is assessed is getting wider, and now is the time to move forward.
Flaw: outdated teaching models
Teachers and leaders faced new challenges daily when the pandemic struck. They were forced to adapt to distance learning, which many had never even attempted. They had to communicate in new ways with parents and students. They were forced to battle an invisible foe, while facing students in school and on computer screens. How did they manage?
While many embraced new styles and strategies, others clung to traditional methods, assuming they would still work--even though most of those methods have been failing for decades. This was especially hard on remote learners, who were forced to muddle through difficult assignments, tests, and homework, without the in-person support of teachers and specialists.
While virtual learning provided opportunities for teachers to get creative, many either chose to ignore the opportunity or simply didn't have enough training and support to effectively teach online. Again, students suffered, as the old-school sit-and-get instruction continued online.
The solution, in most cases, was to race back to school--a frighteningly flawed and shortsighted decision.
Path to change: develop impactful virtual learning programs
While in-school teaching may be back, asynchronous learning is here to stay. We learned so much during the pandemic about teaching stay-at-home, or remote, learners. As the 2020-2021 school year progressed, educators improved their practice daily, learning innovative strategies and embracing new technologies.
Even better, many students became competent independent learners, and producing effective independent learners must always be education's top priority. The path is widening. Now, school leaders must continue clearing it by providing ongoing training for teachers, parents, and students.
We can no longer be shackled to in-school, in-person education. We have to expand the meaning of hybrid education.
"Student reaction has totally sold me on the engagement potential of flipped lectures," writes James Sturtevant, author of Hacking Engagement and creator of the Epic Virtual Presentations video training (click image above to access the free video). "One student told me, 'I prefer the flipped lecture because watching videos is what my generation does.' The challenge for teachers then becomes making engaging flipped (asynchronous) lectures."
Imagine the possibilities. Schools can better manage staffing needs and their physical plants by creating more asynchronous course offerings.
Will distance or remote learning work for all? Of course not. Asynchronous learning can work, though. It will take plenty of planning and might look different in schools across the nation. In time, though, education will be better with this model.
Flaw: Ignoring self-care
Anxiety and depression became central topics during the pandemic, even though mental disorders have presented huge issues for teachers and learners for decades. We've always seemed to push this under the rug, though, as few people want to face the sensitive subject.
The pandemic changed this.
Suddenly, parents, teachers, and some school leaders began discussing the need for a more proactive approach to mental illness and self-care.
So, if we're talking about it, why is it a flaw? Because talking isn't the same as doing. The talk has cleared the path, and now we must do much, much more.
Path to change: teach self-care to students and staff
As more teachers and school leaders understand the impact anxiety and depression have on students and educators, we must take a proactive approach to integrating self-care into classrooms and remote learning spaces. We need to formalize the conversation and move it into the curricula.
"Suffering from anxiety can be lonely, and sufferers are often stuck inside of their own heads by themselves," writes Christine Ravesi-Weinstein, author of Anxious: How to Advocate for Students With Anxiety Because What if It Turns out Right? "Their minds, the illness, becomes their best friend. The isolation that anxiety creates functions as positive feedback. The more isolating it becomes, the more alone they want to be. The sooner educators can step in, the less time anxiety has to isolate its victim."
Consider the last sentence in the book quote above: "The sooner educators can step in...."
The pandemic has cleared the path; "sooner" is now.
Were more flaws revealed during the disastrous 2020-2021 school year? You can probably name many. If we walk the three paths listed in this post, massive change will begin. Then, we can address the other flaws (we'll save that for a future article).
Share your thoughts.
What do you think of these flaws, and what paths are you seeing to massive change in education? Please comment here and keep the conversation moving.